![]() |
| Might not stop you behaving like an asshole though. Pity. |
In spite of strong, consistent, vocal and numerous protests galvanised by the Catholic Church in capital the week before the vote, symbolised by banners proclaiming that the 'traditional family' should be protected, the senate passed the law, the first of its kind in Latin America. The symbol of the marches, by the way: baby girl pink baloon tied to baby blue boy balloon.
If there was a march against the reductive categorising of girls into baby pink and boys into baby blue, I'd be all over that.
- Whatdawewant? I'd shout.
- Gender equality, they'd reply, as manifested by girls who slay dragons with swords!
- When do we want it? I'd say.
- Now, they'd retort, so we can pop those ridiculously reductive baloons.
Not catchy, but I'd be there like a bear. Or a march to burn at the stake - well, at least hit with a stake - the author's of Preventing Homosexulity, which actually is not a hilarious spoof but a hideously well selling text for 'gender-disturbed' children, helping parents to know when and how they should intervene.
Legalising the life choices of a minority group that affects no one outside of their own lives seems an entirely civilised and groovy thing to do. I don't, can't and won't listen or respect those who oppose gay marriage, or gay adoption. Sorry, but the counter arguments are... well... just too dumb to listen to.
Those who state that a 'child deserves a mother and a father' must thereby ban any form of marriage that could in any way damage the child. But, as Philip Larkin once put eloquently, every mum and dad messes up their child. That's what a parent is. If your parents did everything right, who would one complain about during one's adolescence? And what would you do with all those spare therapists, consellors, psychologists, psychoanalysts and landlords? Exactly. Think it through. But seriously, the arguments against a same sex couple adopting are identical to those once raised against couples of different races adopting, and how out of touch and ridiculous do those arguments sound now?
Well, yes, as ridiculous as they did at the time.
They'll get bullied at school. No. You get bullied at school based on a projection of other's fears onto the target. Those fears (homosexulity, different cultures, ya mum) are only going to be reduced by being made more visible and backed up by the state's laws. So you get less bullying. Be a winner; not a sinner.
It doesn't happen in the animal kingdom. Yes it does, when animals have free choice over 'partners' and, really, are you frikkin' kidding me, are you shooting with that? At least give me a challenge.
The Holy Book. It is an abomination according to the Bible. Well, lots of things are adominable, some fair enough, like 'murder', some of them just bonkers, like 'planting two different crops in the same field' (Lev 19:19). Plus, it's ok according to lots of other books. And, on religion... the Catholic Church... sexuality... morality... do you really want to take the moral high ground there? Thought not.
When gays get married in BA and it is not news, that'll be even more progressive, but for now, let us celebrate the following victory for LGBT, common sense, decency, human rights and the YMCA.
... oh, and if you really want to get angry, click this.


